AI is moving fast in education. Faster than policies, faster than governance, and sometimes faster than institutions can comfortably manage. And that is not just a tech issue, it is a risk issue. One data leak, one GDPR violation, one integrity scandal, and suddenly it is not about innovation anymore, but about liability, loss of trust and reputational damage.

But here is the good news: when AI is implemented the right way, the story flips completely. Instead of firefighting risks, institutions gain secure innovation, clearer oversight, and technology that actually supports learning and research without undermining academic values. The difference is not whether you use AI, but whether you stay in control of it.

AI is everywhere by now. We see you here on LinkedIn. That post you shared? Probably not fully written by you. No judgement. You kind of have to embrace it. And yes, AI has found its way into education too. Students are using it, apparently even during exams. Lecturers are experimenting with it. Researchers see new opportunities opening up.

At the same time, educational institutions are left with a growing list of questions. How do you use AI without leaking research data? How do you stay GDPR compliant? What happens to academic integrity and transparency? And above all, how do you stay in control as an institution without throwing your pedagogical values overboard?

AI offers huge potential, but without clear frameworks it quickly becomes a risk instead of an added value. Which is exactly why ethics and privacy should be part of the conversation now. Controlled AI solutions in education are not a nice extra. They are a basic requirement.

Privacy

AI systems have an enormous appetite for data. Learning outcomes, interactions, texts, research input, all of it can be used to generate predictions or responses. But what happens to that data once it is entered? Who has access to it? Where is it stored? And what else is it being used for?

Educational institutions must comply with strict regulations like the GDPR. Yet many standard AI tools run on external servers, often outside Europe, with very little transparency about how data is processed. That creates risks of data leaks, unwanted reuse and grey zones that institutions struggle to control.

Privacy is not a side issue here. It is a prerequisite for maintaining the trust of students, researchers and parents.

Educational data is not training material

What is often underestimated is that many public AI tools learn from their users. Every prompt helps make the system smarter. That means students and researchers are often unknowingly contributing to the training of commercial AI models. In an educational context, that is problematic.

Students do not give informed consent for their thinking processes, texts or assignments to be reused. Researchers risk having ideas, hypotheses or preliminary analyses leave their protected context. That directly clashes with academic freedom and with the responsibility educational institutions carry.

So just regulate it?

Many schools and universities now have AI guidelines in place. But without insight into actual usage, those guidelines often remain purely theoretical.

Who is using AI?

For what purposes?

With which tools?

And how intensively?

Without a central overview, it is nearly impossible to properly enforce privacy agreements, ethical choices and academic rules. Institutions become vulnerable, not because they use AI, but because they cannot steer its use.

Why a controlled AI environment makes the difference

That is why more and more educational institutions are moving away from loose AI tools and towards controlled AI environments. Solutions like MILA by Academic Software are built around the realities of education.

In practice, that means:

• Data stays within the educational context and does not automatically flow to public AI platforms
• Student texts, course materials and research input are not reused for commercial training and is not visible to the institution, gatekeeping the students privacy
• Institutions retain clarity into who uses AI and under which agreements
• AI supports learning and research processes without making autonomous decisions

This way, AI can be used where it truly adds value, without institutions losing control or responsibility.

Privacy is also about trust

Privacy in education is not just about regulation. It is about trust. Students need to feel free to experiment and learn without feeling monitored. Researchers need to think, write and test without fearing their work will surface elsewhere.

By treating privacy as a starting point instead of an afterthought, institutions create room for innovation that is sustainable. Not everything that is technically possible should automatically be allowed.

AI is here to stay. The real question is not whether educational institutions will use it, but how thoughtfully they will do so.

Those who prioritise ease of use without a framework, take risks. Those who build technology on ethics and privacy create trust.

And that is where the real value of AI in education lies today. AI can strengthen education, but only if institutions remain in control. The question is not whether we use AI, but under which conditions.

How are you dealing with this today within education or research?

Interested or questions? Contact us!